Court finds lack of Certificate of Conformity an Irregularity
October 19, 2022
Tackling Oppressive Restrictive Covenants In Foreclosure
September 29, 2023
FV Supervising Attorney Zachary Gold, recently obtained a significant FAPA ruling from the Nassau County Supreme Court, denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss under FAPA. After nearly a decade of post-judgment litigation, the defendant filed for dismissal under FAPA arguing that the judgment had not been enforced at the time of FAPA’s passage because sale had not been held. The court agreed with our argument that this “would not be a reasonable interpretation [and] for the purposes of retroactive application […] once a sale has been scheduled the judgment is deemed enforced.”
DISCLAIMER
This publication may constitute attorney advertising under the laws and rules of professional conduct of one or more states. The information provided in this publication is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The contents are not intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice, consultation, or representation. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading or relying on this publication. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Readers should consult a qualified attorney for advice regarding their individual circumstances or any specific legal questions they may have.
If you have questions about this publication, please contact Adam Friedman, Ralph Vartolo or Michael DeRosa,
Friedman Vartolo LLP, 1325 Franklin Avenue, Suite 160, Garden City, NY 11530, Phone: (212) 471-5100 | Fax: (212) 471-5150.
