New Jersey – Condo and HOA Liens
September 22, 2016RPAPL § 1309: Expedited Application for Judgment
December 21, 2016
In Block v. Seneca Mortgage (3:16-cv-00449) the Plaintiff/Homeowner asserts that her loan servicer’s failure to offer a permanent modification after her successful completion of a trial modification was breach of contract. U.S. District Judge Freda Wolfson denied a motion to dismiss the claim and determined that the elements of a breach of contract were evident.
The facts of the case suggest that the reason for the eventual permanent modification denial was a service transfer but the takeaways are clear. While the underlying goal of a trial modification offer is a permanent resolution, servicers and investors must protect themselves. Trial modifications require not only payment according to their terms but additional documentation and certifications. These requirements should be clearly explained within the trial modification so a permanent mod denial on the basis of failure to provide the same is not deemed breach of contract on the lender’s part.
Written By Adam J. Friedman
DISCLAIMER
This publication may constitute attorney advertising under the laws and rules of professional conduct of one or more states. The information provided in this publication is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The contents are not intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice, consultation, or representation. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading or relying on this publication. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Readers should consult a qualified attorney for advice regarding their individual circumstances or any specific legal questions they may have.
If you have questions about this publication, please contact Adam Friedman, Ralph Vartolo or Michael DeRosa,
Friedman Vartolo LLP, 1325 Franklin Avenue, Suite 160, Garden City, NY 11530, Phone: (212) 471-5100 | Fax: (212) 471-5150.
