
New York Court of Appeals Hears Oral Arguments in Article 13 LLC v. LaSalle National Bank: Three Key Takeaways
October 22, 2025
FICO’s New Direct Model May Shift Credit Scoring Economics
October 24, 2025October 24, 2025
On September 17, 2025, the D.C. Council voted 10–3 to approve the Rebalancing Expectations for Neighbors, Tenants, and Landlords (RENTAL) Act (the “Act”). For context, the D.C. Council is the legislative branch of the District of Columbia responsible for passing local laws and budgets; its authority, however, remains subject to Congressional review. The measure, introduced by Councilmember Robert White, includes alterations to eviction timelines and carves out new exemptions from the existing Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act (TOPA). Supporters argue the changes are needed to address a surge in unpaid rent, reduce an eviction backlog, and attract affordable housing investment to the city. If implemented, the RENTAL Act could mark the most significant shift in tenant protections in the District in years. It may redefine how landlords, tenants, and investors navigate D.C.’s strained housing market.
Tenant advocates, however, warn that the bill strips renters of crucial bargaining rights and may accelerate displacement. Groups like Legal Aid DC, for example, argue that curtailing TOPA undermines a proven tool for preserving affordability and leaves vulnerable residents with fewer defenses against eviction. Councilmembers Janeese Lewis George, Brianne Nadeau, and Trayon White voted against the measure. They cited rushed amendments and limited debate on its far-reaching impact. The Act now sits at the center of an ongoing debate: whether loosening regulations will stimulate housing investment or destabilize the lives of thousands of District renters.
DISCLAIMER
This publication may constitute attorney advertising under the laws and rules of professional conduct of one or more states. The information provided in this publication is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The contents are not intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice, consultation, or representation. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading or relying on this publication. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Readers should consult a qualified attorney for advice regarding their individual circumstances or any specific legal questions they may have.
If you have questions about this publication, please contact Adam Friedman, Ralph Vartolo or Michael DeRosa,
Friedman Vartolo LLP, 1325 Franklin Avenue, Suite 160, Garden City, NY 11530, Phone: (212) 471-5100 | Fax: (212) 471-5150.




