
Appellate Division Rejects Proposed Intervenor’s Belated Challenge to the Foreclosure Judgment and Indicates That the Intervenor Engaged in Sanctionable Litigation Misconduct
January 23, 2025The Weekly Friedman | Maryland Mortgage Holder Update featuring Rachel Kiefer
January 23, 2025In this episode of *The Weekly Friedman*, host Adam Friedman welcomes back senior appellate counsel Stephen Vargas to discuss the critical case of FLA Mortgage Capital v. Paul. The conversation dives into the Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA), retroactivity challenges, and the procedural nuances that shaped this significant decision.
Discover why this ruling is a game-changer for the mortgage servicing industry, setting a precedent that limits the retroactive application of FAPA amendments and provides clarity on post-judgment procedural defenses.
DISCLAIMER
This publication may constitute attorney advertising under the laws and rules of professional conduct of one or more states. The information provided in this publication is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The contents are not intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice, consultation, or representation. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading or relying on this publication. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Readers should consult a qualified attorney for advice regarding their individual circumstances or any specific legal questions they may have.
If you have questions about this publication, please contact Adam Friedman, Ralph Vartolo or Michael DeRosa,
Friedman Vartolo LLP, 1325 Franklin Avenue, Suite 160, Garden City, NY 11530, Phone: (212) 471-5100 | Fax: (212) 471-5150.




