• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Services
  • Team
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact

Successful arguments result in published decision regarding the New York 90 day Notice

April 2, 2019 by Adam Friedman

We are pleased to share a recent published decision of a case handled by Friedman Vartolo, LLP.  Hon. Linda J. Kevins of Suffolk County, New York granted the motion for summary judgment and denied the defendant’s cross motion after reviewing several innovative arguments made by the firm.  Wells Fargo Bank, Nat. Ass’n v. Rodriguez, No. 600433/2017, 2018 N.Y.Slip Op 32793(U), Sup. Ct. Oct 26, 2018.  https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/other-courts/2018/2018-ny-slip-op-32793-u.html

The Court held that:  (1) the insertion of additional bankruptcy language in the RPAPL 1304 90 day notice did not violate the mandates under the statute that no other notice be included with the 90 day notice and was found to be “important qualifying information”; (2) the delivery of the 90 day notice satisfied the 30 day notice requirements pursuant to the terms of the mortgage; (3) although the plaintiff may not submit new evidence for the first time in reply papers, plaintiff may establish compliance with RPAPL 1304 in reply papers, if raised for the first time on opposition by Defendant; (4) a Defendant’s failure to oppose certain arguments by Plaintiff in its motion is deemed an admission of those arguments.

A great job by Zachary Gold, Esq. of our firm! For more information regarding this case, please contact:  Deborah Gallo, Director of Operations at [email protected]

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

PRACTICE AREAS

  • Default Services
  • Residential
  • Real Estate Litigation
  • Commercial Transactions
  • Foreclosures
  • Bankruptcy
  • Evictions

POPULAR ARTICLES

Per Appellate Division, a discharge in bankruptcy does not automatically accelerate the debt & the terms of the mortgage survive bankruptcy

NJ law inhibits loss of affordable homes

Transferred loans in modification process must include all necessary documents to new servicer, so they can honor agreements

New requirements of the TP 584 and NYC RPT forms – further developments

Are Federal Housing Authority Loans subject to NY statute of limitations?

Department of Financial Services adds Bengali to the list of languages for the 90 day Notice under RPAPL 1304

NY Court case defines “borrower” under RPAPL 1304

New requirements of the TP 584 and NYC RPT forms

Amendment of RPAPL 3408(4)(k) – Vacant and Abandoned Properties in NY

Bill has passed the Senate and Assembly – Could Reduce the Tax Foreclosure Waiting Period

Authors Name

Adam Friedman (5)
  • Per Appellate Division, a discharge in bankruptcy does not automatically accelerate the debt & the terms of the mortgage survive bankruptcy
  • NJ law inhibits loss of affordable homes
  • Transferred loans in modification process must include all necessary documents to new servicer, so they can honor agreements
  • New requirements of the TP 584 and NYC RPT forms - further developments
  • Are Federal Housing Authority Loans subject to NY statute of limitations?
Michael Derosa (3)
  • A Good Faith Notice Before Moving For Default
  • No More “Re-Notice” Requirement Westchester and Putnam County
  • How Quickly Can a Mortgagee Complete an Uncontested Foreclosure Action in NY?
Ralph Vartolo (1)
  • Criticism of Cuomo’s Certificate of Merit Law & The Real Effects It Will Have

Footer

MCM Categories

  • Slider Background
  • Team Detail Page Photo
  • Team Main Page Photo

© 2019 Friedman Vartolo LLP. All Rights Reserved

This website may constitute attorney advertising under the New York Code of Professional Responsibility. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

DESIGNED BY BOFILL TECH