January 8, 2026

On Wednesday, January 7, 2026, President Donald Trump called for a ban on “large institutional investors” purchasing single-family homes as part of an effort to address housing affordability. In a Truth Social post, President Trump stated that he is “immediately taking steps” toward such a ban and plans to ask Congress to codify it. His post also stated that “people live in homes, not corporations,” and that “[f]or a very long time, buying and owning a home was considered the pinnacle of the American Dream.” He added that inflation had put the dream out of reach for many Americans.

According to Reuters, it was not immediately clear what authority the President may rely upon to implement such a ban and that the request to Congress does not currently include a detailed legislative framework. At present, the proposal is framed as a housing affordability measure that the administration positions as a response to institutional investor activity in the single-family housing market.

The announcement prompted immediate commentary from national outlets and housing analysts.

USA Today reported that “[m]any housing experts are skeptical that banning institutional homebuying would make a sizeable difference in the housing market overall, but Wall Street investors can be popular scapegoats.”  The Hill reported that the proposal may also play a role in addressing affordability issues ahead of the midterm elections amid persistent inflation concerns. Fox Business stated that “[t]he president’s announcement caused shares in homebuilders to plunge during Wednesday’s trading session” and, according to BBC, shares of Blackstone, one of the largest private equity buyers, fell more than 5% following the statement during Wednesday’s trading session.

Additional reporting introduced questions about the scale and potential impact of institutional ownership. Laurie Goodman, a fellow at the Urban Institute, stated that institutional investors, defined as owners of at least 1,000 single-family units across three (3) or more markets, account for about 4% of the single-family housing market and that this share remained relatively stable in recent years as higher interest rates and home prices slowed purchases. Goodman also suggested that enhanced tenant obligations by investors could serve as an alternative policy approach. Separately, Daryl Fairweather, chief economist at Redfin, cautioned that restricting large institutional investors could result in increased participation by mid-sized or smaller investors rather than expanded access for first-time homebuyers.

We will continue to monitor the situation and will keep our audience informed of any material developments.

DISCLAIMER

This publication may constitute attorney advertising under the laws and rules of professional conduct of one or more states. The information provided in this publication is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The contents are not intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice, consultation, or representation. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading or relying on this publication. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Readers should consult a qualified attorney for advice regarding their individual circumstances or any specific legal questions they may have.

If you have questions about this publication, please contact Adam Friedman, Ralph Vartolo or Michael DeRosa,
Friedman Vartolo LLP, 1325 Franklin Avenue, Suite 160, Garden City, NY 11530, Phone: (212) 471-5100 | Fax: (212) 471-5150.