• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Services
  • Team
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact

Foreclosures & Failure to Prosecute

July 5, 2016 by Adam Friedman

February 11, 2014

Once a residential foreclosure matter is released from the Foreclosure Settlement Conference Part the Plaintiff can file a motion requesting a Court order appointing a Referee to compute the total amount due the Plaintiff on the underlying debt. Prior to filing a motion, the Plaintiff’s attorney must receive an OCA Affidavit from their client and then sign an OCA Affirmation. If the Plaintiff attorney experiences a delay in receiving that affidavit, or if there is an issue with the bank’s paperwork, the Plaintiff’s attorney is unable to sign the OCA Affirmation and in turn unable to file the motion.

When a motion isn’t filed it remains in the Foreclosure Settlement Conference Part and therefore in that part’s inventory. Over the past 18 months or so these parts have received pressure to clean up their inventory. As a result, these parts have started to dismiss cases for failure to prosecute pursuant to CPLR 3215 (if an answer was not filed) or CPLR 3216 (if an answer was filed). Every county differs slightly in their approach. Some hold Foreclosure Status Conferences whereby a Judge or Referee will question the Plaintiff’s attorney on the status of the case and pressure them to move their case along. Other counties (most notably Westchester County) schedule dismissal calendars where Plaintiff attorneys that cannot represent on the record that they have received the OCA Affidavit have their cases dismissed.

As you can imagine this creates numerous additional court appearances. While it may provide some temporary assistance to homeowners, 99% of the time the action will be recommenced after dismissal. While the Foreclosure Settlement Conference parts are able to clear up their inventories through this process, more often than not it simply delays the inevitable.

Written By Adam J. Friedman

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

PRACTICE AREAS

  • Default Services
  • Residential
  • Real Estate Litigation
  • Commercial Transactions
  • Foreclosures
  • Bankruptcy
  • Evictions

POPULAR ARTICLES

Recent NY case finds lack of NY form of Certificate of Conformity an Irregularity

Upcoming changes to Debt Validation under 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a) (2021)

Appeals Court of MA reviews Preclusion and Res Judicata in a Foreclosure action

NY Appellate Court finds failure to comply with RPAPL 1304 when mailing of the 90-day notice jointly addressed to two+ borrowers in a single envelope

NY Appellate Court addresses whether Administrative Code of NYC licensing under Section 20-490 applies to Mortgage Plaintiff

NY Hardship Declaration stay extended to January 15, 2022

NY Gov. Hochul announces special session for Legislature to extend eviction moratorium

PA Court issues decision addressing contradictory copies of the Note and Standing

CFPB final rule regarding early intervention and loss mitigation effective 8/31/2021

NY Appellate Court issues decision further defining evidentiary standard

Authors Name

Adam Friedman (5)
  • Recent NY case finds lack of NY form of Certificate of Conformity an Irregularity
  • Upcoming changes to Debt Validation under 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a) (2021)
  • Appeals Court of MA reviews Preclusion and Res Judicata in a Foreclosure action
  • NY Appellate Court finds failure to comply with RPAPL 1304 when mailing of the 90-day notice jointly addressed to two+ borrowers in a single envelope
  • NY Appellate Court addresses whether Administrative Code of NYC licensing under Section 20-490 applies to Mortgage Plaintiff
Michael Derosa (3)
  • A Good Faith Notice Before Moving For Default
  • No More “Re-Notice” Requirement Westchester and Putnam County
  • How Quickly Can a Mortgagee Complete an Uncontested Foreclosure Action in NY?
Ralph Vartolo (1)
  • Criticism of Cuomo’s Certificate of Merit Law & The Real Effects It Will Have

Footer

MCM Categories

  • Slider Background
  • Team Detail Page Photo
  • Team Main Page Photo

© 2022 Friedman Vartolo LLP. All Rights Reserved

This website may constitute attorney advertising under the New York Code of Professional Responsibility. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

DESIGNED BY BOFILL TECH