
Maryland Executive Order Targets Housing Supply Gaps
September 12, 2025
Bridging the Gap: AI Tools Expand Mortgage Access for Underserved Buyers
September 16, 2025September 15, 2025
Florida (“FL”) Gov. Ron DeSantis is advancing a constitutional amendment to eliminate property taxes for homeowners. The plan is tied to his ‘Florida DOGE’ initiative, a state version of the Department of Government Efficiency that audits local budgets and targets waste. Supporters frame the proposal as long-term tax relief and a way to streamline government spending, arguing that homeowners should not feel as if they are renting from the state. Yet it also raises questions about how Florida’s counties and municipalities would replace a revenue stream that, in at least one county, accounts for more than a third of operating budgets. Local leaders caution that property taxes fund essential services such as public safety, infrastructure, and staff, warning that eliminating this revenue could force fee hikes or service reductions. For lenders and investors, the proposal highlights how tax policy debates can alter the funding base that supports collateral performance in local markets.
The outcome of this initiative will hinge on both policy design and voter approval, with the proposal slated for the 2026 ballot. If property taxes were eliminated, municipalities could face short-term fiscal stress unless new revenue sources are identified, creating potential ripple effects across real estate portfolios. While some see the initiative as a bold restructuring of government finance, others view it as a fiscal risk that may undermine municipal stability. As Florida enters an election cycle where affordability and efficiency remain high-profile issues, the default industry should prepare for the possibility that traditional assumptions about property tax revenue and its role in supporting local governments and property values may change.
DISCLAIMER
This publication may constitute attorney advertising under the laws and rules of professional conduct of one or more states. The information provided in this publication is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The contents are not intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice, consultation, or representation. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading or relying on this publication. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Readers should consult a qualified attorney for advice regarding their individual circumstances or any specific legal questions they may have.
If you have questions about this publication, please contact Adam Friedman, Ralph Vartolo or Michael DeRosa,
Friedman Vartolo LLP, 1325 Franklin Avenue, Suite 160, Garden City, NY 11530, Phone: (212) 471-5100 | Fax: (212) 471-5150.




