• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Services
  • Team
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact

NYC DCA issues revisions to Debt Collection rules effective 10/1/2020

October 1, 2020 by Adam Friedman

The New York City Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) has issued a set of revisions to its debt collection rules that are intended to track consumer language preferences and apprise consumers of the availability of language services, either from the servicer or the DCA. These new requirements, which are effective as of October 1, 2020, affect recordkeeping, translation quality (should a collector decide to provide translations), the debt validation notice, and any public website maintained by the servicer. These changes are made to Title 6 of the Rules of the City of New York (RCNY). The particulars of these changes are outlined below, with specific citations for each new requirement. Please note that these revisions do not require the servicer to provide any new language services; if a servicer chooses to provide language services, it must inform the consumer of their availability and ensure their accuracy.

Language Preference Tracking and Annual Report

The following are additional recordkeeping burdens borne by the servicer.

  • Servicers must make reasonable efforts to ascertain every consumer’s language preference and maintain a record of it. 6 RCNY § 2-193(b)(5).
  • Servicers must prepare an annual report, using a form provided by the DCA, disclosing (1) the number of accounts on which non-English collection communications were made and (2) the number of employees that conducted these non-English collection communications. 6 RCNY § 2-193(c)(3). Please note that this annual report form does not appear to be available at this time.

Prohibition on Inaccurate or Incomplete Translations and Requirement to Disclose Language Preference

The following will now be included in the legal definition of “false, deceptive, or misleading” representations:

  • Any “false, inaccurate, or partial” translation of a collection communication, if the servicer is providing the translation. Please note that the servicer is not required to provide translation services under this revision. However, should a servicer decide to do so, the translation must be complete and correct. 6 RCNY § 5-77(d)(18).
  • Failure to accurately disclose a consumer’s known language preference when returning or selling an account, or when referring an account for litigation. 6 RCNY § 5-77(d)(18). Please note that our interpretation of this is that the next contact with any existing NYC consumer should include a request for their language preference. The first contact with any new consumer should also include this request, unless a prior servicer has already included the consumer’s language preference information in a transfer file.

In addition, the following will now be included in the legal definition of “unfair or unconscionable means” of collecting a debt:

  • Attempting to collect a debt without first requesting the consumer’s language preference and keeping a record of it. 6 RCNY § 5-77(e)(9).

Additional Requirements for Debt Validation Notices and Public Websites

The following are additional statements which must now be included in the standard debt validation notice sent to any NYC consumer:

  • A statement informing the consumer of any language services provided by the servicer, including whether the servicer will provide non-English translations of all communications. 6 RCNY § 5-77(f)(2)(vii). As noted above, the servicer is not required to provide translation services under this revision. However, should a servicer decide to do so, it must inform the consumer that these services are available.
  • A statement that the consumer may find “translation and description” of common debt-collection terms, in multiple languages, on the DCA website: www.nyc.gov/dca. 6 RCNY § 5-77(f)(2)(viii).

These same two statements, regarding (1) language services provided by the servicer and (2) the glossary provided by the DCA, must be added “clearly and conspicuously” to any website maintained by the servicer that is accessible by the public. 6 RCNY § 5-77(h)(1)-(2). Note that since these rules only apply to New York City, it is our recommendation that such website disclosures clearly indicate that they are for NYC consumers only. The DCA has added a new penalty to its enforcement schedule for failure to comply with this new website requirement. The penalties match those for violation of the debt validation notice requirements: $260 for a first violation, $315 for a second violation, and $350 per any additional violation. 6 RCNY § 6-62.  For any questions regarding this article, please contact Deborah Gallo, Director of Operations, as dgallo@friedmanvartolo.com.

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

PRACTICE AREAS

  • Default Services
  • Residential
  • Real Estate Litigation
  • Commercial Transactions
  • Foreclosures
  • Bankruptcy
  • Evictions

POPULAR ARTICLES

COVID-19 Emergency Eviction and Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2020 and Administrative Orders

Recent decision clarifies RPAPL 1302-a

NY Bill S4190 requires including name & telephone number of the mortgage servicer on FC documents

NY Administrative order 232/20 released

New York Foreclosure sales slowly move forward

NYC DCA issues revisions to Debt Collection rules effective 10/1/2020

The New York Split on whether Default Letters are deemed Acceleration of the Loan Continues…

New York State Office of Court Administration issues Guidance on Evictions

Senate Bill S4408 passes the House and Senate in NY; Potential changes to Reverse Mortgage foreclosure process

NYS Court Administration has issued an Administrative Order which lifts the general stay on residential foreclosures

Authors Name

Adam Friedman (5)
  • COVID-19 Emergency Eviction and Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2020 and Administrative Orders
  • Recent decision clarifies RPAPL 1302-a
  • NY Bill S4190 requires including name & telephone number of the mortgage servicer on FC documents
  • NY Administrative order 232/20 released
  • New York Foreclosure sales slowly move forward
Michael Derosa (3)
  • A Good Faith Notice Before Moving For Default
  • No More “Re-Notice” Requirement Westchester and Putnam County
  • How Quickly Can a Mortgagee Complete an Uncontested Foreclosure Action in NY?
Ralph Vartolo (1)
  • Criticism of Cuomo’s Certificate of Merit Law & The Real Effects It Will Have

Footer

MCM Categories

  • Slider Background
  • Team Detail Page Photo
  • Team Main Page Photo

© 2021 Friedman Vartolo LLP. All Rights Reserved

This website may constitute attorney advertising under the New York Code of Professional Responsibility. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

DESIGNED BY BOFILL TECH