
A Cautionary Tale in Foreclosure: Why Knowing Your Senior Lienholder Matters
September 4, 2025
Rent-Stabilization Hardship Relief Fails Small Landlords as Housing Rents Rise Amid Election Spotlight
September 8, 2025September 4, 2025
On August 28, 2025, the Mercer County Chancery Division ruled that the Nonprofit Community Development Corporation (hereinafter “nonprofit”)’s “right of second refusal” under New Jersey’s Community Wealth Preservation Program (“CWPP”) is unconstitutional. In the consolidated docket, Atlantic County Sheriffs and Joseph O’Donoghue v. State of New Jersey, Docket No. MER-C-000094-24, the trial court held that the second right of refusal under N.J.S.A. 2A:50-64(g) is unconstitutional as applied to both property owners and junior lienholders. It found that eliminating competitive bidding and the resulting loss of equity violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution. The ruling eliminates the ability of nonprofits to exercise second-refusal rights going forward.
Friedman Vartolo LLP filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the American Institute of Servicing and Legal Executives (AISLE), a national trade organization of which FV is a founding member, inter alia in support of the position that the nonprofit right of second refusal should be invalidated. However, because the Court also held that the CWPP is not retroactive, any matter where a property was sold to a nonprofit under the CWPP outside of the consolidated docket will remain undisturbed. The Court also left intact the right of first refusal for occupying owners, heirs, and tenants, although its reasoning signals that this provision may be vulnerable to future constitutional challenge. This decision is among the first to test the CWPP in court and marks a pivotal clarification: nonprofits no longer enjoy statutory second-refusal rights at sheriff’s sales in New Jersey.
DISCLAIMER
This publication may constitute attorney advertising under the laws and rules of professional conduct of one or more states. The information provided in this publication is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The contents are not intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice, consultation, or representation. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading or relying on this publication. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Readers should consult a qualified attorney for advice regarding their individual circumstances or any specific legal questions they may have.
If you have questions about this publication, please contact Adam Friedman, Ralph Vartolo or Michael DeRosa,
Friedman Vartolo LLP, 1325 Franklin Avenue, Suite 160, Garden City, NY 11530, Phone: (212) 471-5100 | Fax: (212) 471-5150.




